Page 39 - Ship Construction.DJ Eyres 6Ed
P. 39

Ch03-H8070.fm  Page 28  Wednesday, October 18, 2006  6:52 AM
                 28                        Ship Construction
                 of alternative tanker designs, the United States legislation did not, and no
                 alternative designs were built.
                   As the result of the break up of the tanker Erika and subsequent pollu-
                 tion of the French coastline in 1999 IMO members decided to accelerate
                 the phase out of single hull tankers. As a result in April 2001 a stricter time-
                 table for the phasing out of single  hull tankers entered into force in
                 September 2003. In December 2003 a decision to further accelerate the
                      --- ใช้เพื่อการศึกษาเท่านั้น---
                 phase out dates of single hull tankers was agreed. Pre – MARPOL tankers
                 being phased out in 2005 and MARPOL tankers and small tankers in 2010
                 (see Chapter 2 for definitions).
                          งานห้องสมุด ศูนย์ฝกพาณิชย์นาวี
                   Oil tankers now generally have a single pump space aft, adjacent to the
                 machinery, and specified slop tanks into which tank washings and oily res-
                 idues are pumped. Tank cleaning may be accomplished by water driven
                 rotating machines on the smaller tankers but for new crude oil tankers of
                 20,000 tonnes deadweight and above the tank cleaning system shall use
                 crude oil washing.



                 Passenger Ships
                                                          ึ
                 Early passenger ships did not have the tiers of superstructure associated
                 with modern vessels, and they also had a narrower beam in relation to the
                 length. The reason for the absence  of superstructure decks was the
                 Merchant Shipping Act 1894 which  limited the number of passengers
                 carried on the upper deck. An amendment to this Act in 1906 removed this
                 restriction and vessels were then built with several tiers of superstructures.
                 This produced problems of strength and stability, stability being improved
                 by an increase in beam. The transmission of stresses to the superstructure
                 from the main hull girder created much difference of opinion as to the
                 means of overcoming the problem. Both light structures of a discontinuous
                 nature, i.e. fitted with expansion joints, and superstructures with heavier
                 scantlings able to contribute to the strength of the main hull girder were
                 introduced. Present practice, where the length of the superstructure is
                 appreciable and has its sides at the ship side, does not require the fitting of
                 expansion joints.
                   The introduction of aluminium alloy superstructures provided increased
                 passenger accommodation on the same draft, and/or a lowering of the light-
                 weight centre of gravity with improved stability. This was brought about by
                 the lighter weight of the aluminium alloy structure. Subsequent experience
                 however has shown that for passenger liners, that are required to maintain
                 a service speed in a seaway, the maintenance costs of aluminium alloy
                 superstructures can be higher.
                   A feature of the general arrangement  is the reduction in size of the
                 machinery space in this time. It is easy to see the reason for this if the
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44