Page 38 - Ship Construction.DJ Eyres 6Ed
P. 38

Ch03-H8070.fm  Page 27  Wednesday, October 18, 2006  6:52 AM
                                       Development of Ship Types                  27
                   The requirements of the International Convention for the Prevention of
                 Pollution from Ships 1973 (see Chapter 29) and particularly its Protocol of
                 1978 have greatly influenced the arrangement of the cargo spaces of oil
                 tankers. A major feature of the MARPOL Convention and its Protocol has
                 been the provision in larger tankers of clean water ballast capacity. Whilst
                 primarily  intended to reduce the pollution risk, the fitting of segregated
                 water ballast tanks in the midship region aids the reduction of the still water
                      --- ใช้เพื่อการศึกษาเท่านั้น---
                 bending moment when the tanker is fully loaded. It also reduces corrosion
                 problems associated with tank spaces which are subject to alternate oil and
                 sea water ballast cargoes.
                          งานห้องสมุด ศูนย์ฝกพาณิชย์นาวี
                   In March 1989 the tanker Exxon Valdez, which complied fully with the then
                 current MARPOL requirements, ran aground and discharged 11 million gal-
                 lons of crude oil into the pristine waters of Prince William Sound in Alaska.
                 The subsequent public outcry led to the United States Congress passing the
                 Oil Pollution Act 1990 (OPA 90). This unilateral action by the United
                 States Government made it a requirement that existing single hull oil tankers
                 operating in United States waters were to be phased out by an early date, after
                 which all oil tankers were to have a double hull (see Figures 3.6 and 22.7).
                   In November 1990 the USA suggested that the MARPOL Convention
                 should be amended to make double hulls compulsory for new tankers. A
                                                          ึ
                 number of other IMO member states suggested that alternative designs
                 offering equivalent protection against accidental oil spills should be accepted.
                 In particular Japan proposed an alternative, the mid-deck tanker. This
                 design has side ballast tanks providing  protection  against  collision  but  no
                 double bottom. The cargo tank space (see Figure 3.6) had a structural deck
                 running its full length at about 0.25 to 0.5 the depth from the bottom which
                 ensures that should the bottom be ruptured the upward pressure exerted by
                 the sea would prevent most of the oil from escaping into the sea.
                   In 1992 IMO adopted amendments to MARPOL which required tankers
                 of 5000 tonnes deadweight and above  contracted for after July 1993, or
                 which commenced construction after January 1994, to be of double – hulled
                 or mid-deck construction , or of other design offering equivalent protection
                 against oil pollution. Existing tankers with single hulls without segregated
                 ballast tanks with protective location were to be phased out by June 2007.
                 Those with segregated ballast tanks with protective location, were to be
                 phased out by July 2021.
                   Studies by IMO and the US National Academy of Sciences confirmed the
                 effectiveness of the double hull in preventing oil spills caused by grounding
                 and collision where the inner hull is not breached. The mid-deck tanker was
                 shown to have more favourable outflow performance in extreme accidents
                 where the inner hull is breached. The United States authorities considered
                 grounding the most prevalent type of accident in their waters and believed
                 only the double hull type prevented spills from tanker groundings in all but
                 the most severe incidents. Thus, whilst MARPOL provided for the acceptance
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43